{"id":3862,"date":"2026-05-08T03:58:58","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T03:58:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/?p=3862"},"modified":"2026-05-08T05:05:45","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T05:05:45","slug":"bharat-vs-india-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/?p=3862","title":{"rendered":"\u201cBHARAT\u201d vs \u201cINDIA\u201d CONTROVERSY"},"content":{"rendered":"

Part 01<\/h2>\n

Proposal to remove \u201cIndia\u201d and use only \u201cBharat\u201d \u2013 What is the Hidden Saffron Agenda?<\/h2>\n
\n

In September 2023, a seemingly small change on a G20 dinner invitation sparked a national firestorm. The President of India was suddenly referred to as the \u201cPresident of Bharat.\u201d Within days, Prime Minister Modi sat behind a placard reading \u201cBharat\u201d at the world\u2019s most powerful diplomatic summit. What appeared as a symbolic tweak was, in reality, the opening salvo of a carefully orchestrated campaign to redefine India\u2019s identity \u2013 from its colonial past to its Hindu future. This article unpacks the hidden agenda, the political strategy, the constitutional history, and the ground reality behind the Bharat vs India controversy.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

WHAT<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 A sustained political and ideological campaign to replace the English name \u201cIndia\u201d with the Sanskrit-derived \u201cBharat\u201d in official, diplomatic, and constitutional usage.<\/p>\n

WHO<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Led by the BJP and its ideological mentor RSS, supported by senior ministers, and amplified by a compliant media ecosystem.<\/p>\n

WHEN<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Intensified dramatically during the G20 Summit in September 2023 and continuing through 2025, with RSS affiliates launching signature campaigns for constitutional amendment.<\/p>\n

WHERE<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Across official government communications, G20 documentation, presidential invitations, and now proposed for constitutional changes.<\/p>\n

WHY<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 To advance the Hindutva agenda of \u201cdecolonization\u201d by erasing colonial-era nomenclature, while simultaneously neutralizing the opposition\u2019s \u201cINDIA\u201d alliance branding ahead of the 2024 general elections.<\/p>\n

HOW<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Through strategic use of presidential invitations, diplomatic placards, government booklets, sustained RSS advocacy, and potential constitutional amendment.<\/p>\n

\n

THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK \u2013 WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS DEBATED<\/strong><\/p>\n

The controversy begins and ends with Article 1 of the Indian Constitution. Drafted after months of intense debate, Article 1 currently states:\u00a0\u201cIndia, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Constituent Assembly Debate (1949)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The matter was discussed at great length on September 17-18, 1949. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar proposed the formulation \u201cIndia, that is, Bharat.\u201d However, other members sought a more prominent place for \u201cBharat.\u201d<\/p>\n

H.V. Kamath moved an amendment seeking \u201cBharat or, in the English language, India, shall be a Union of States,\u201d calling the original expression \u201csomewhat clumsy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Seth Govind Das argued passionately for \u201cBharat known as India also in foreign countries,\u201d stating that naming the country as Bharat was only \u201cbefitting our history and our culture.\u201d He reminded the Assembly, \u201cWe had fought the battle of freedom under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi by raising the slogan of \u2018Bharat Mata Ki Jai.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Govind Ballabh Pant wanted \u201cBharat\u201d or \u201cBharat Varsha\u201d in place of \u201cIndia.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ultimately, except Ambedkar\u2019s amendment, all other proposals were either negatived or withdrawn. The Assembly thus adopted \u201cIndia, that is, Bharat\u201d \u2013 placing \u201cIndia\u201d first, followed by \u201cBharat\u201d as its equivalent.<\/p>\n

Key Historical Note:<\/strong>\u00a0The Constitution, originally drafted in English, does not refer to \u201cBharat\u201d in any other provision beyond Article 1. The Preamble refers to \u201cWe the People of India.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

THE G20 SUMMIT \u2013 THE CATALYST THAT IGNITED THE DEBATE<\/strong><\/p>\n

In September 2023, as India hosted the G20 Summit in New Delhi, a seemingly minor change sent shockwaves through the political establishment.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Event<\/th>\nDetails<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Presidential Invitation<\/strong><\/td>\nG20 dinner invitation referred to Head of State Droupadi Murmu as \u201cPresident of Bharat\u201d instead of \u201cPresident of India\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PM\u2019s Placard<\/strong><\/td>\nPrime Minister Modi sat behind a name placard reading \u201cBharat\u201d instead of \u201cIndia\u201d during the inaugural session<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Government Booklet<\/strong><\/td>\nA booklet titled \u201cBharat \u2013 The Mother of Democracy\u201d was distributed, stating: \u201cIn Bharat that is India, the view or the will of the people in governance has been a central part of life\u201d \u2013 notably inverting the constitutional order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Official Badges<\/strong><\/td>\nIndian officials at the G20 event wore badges reading \u201cBharat Official\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Prime Minister Modi used the opportunity to emphasize the need to \u201cliberate ourselves from the slavery mindset,\u201d directly linking the name change to his broader decolonization agenda.<\/p>\n

\n

THE SAFFRON AGENDA \u2013 BEYOND THE SYMBOLIC NAME CHANGE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The RSS Long-Term Campaign<\/strong><\/p>\n

The name \u201cBharat\u201d campaign is not new. It has been a consistent ideological demand of the RSS for decades. The RSS has tagged the term \u201cBharat\u201d into the title of many of its affiliates.<\/p>\n

In March 2025, RSS national general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale reignited the debate, questioning why institutions like the Reserve Bank of India or the Constitution should still carry English names. \u201cDesh ka naam Bharat hai, toh Bharat hi Bolo. India toh angrezi naam hai,\u201d he declared.<\/p>\n

Hosabale linked the issue to a broader need for\u00a0\u201cdecolonisation of mind,\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0arguing that British rule left a deep imprint that continues to shape Indian consciousness. He cited historical instances of cultural erasure, from the destruction of temples and gurukuls during Mughal invasions to the imposition of English as a dominant language.<\/p>\n

The RSS Argument:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • \n

    \u201cBharat\u201d is derived from two words: \u201cBha\u201d (light) and \u201cRata\u201d (devoted) \u2013 meaning a land devoted to the pursuit of knowledge and enlightenment<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    \u201cIndia\u201d allegedly lacks meaning; even the Oxford Dictionary associates it with definitions that some claim are demeaning<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    2. The Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas (SSUN) Campaign<\/strong><\/p>\n

    In February 2025, SSUN, an RSS affiliate, launched a month-long national signature campaign titled\u00a0\u201cOne nation one name: Bharat.\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0The campaign was launched at 200 locations across India with the aim of collecting one million signatures by March 21.<\/p>\n

    The campaign wrote to President Murmu urging the government to use \u201cBharat\u201d in all official communications until a constitutional amendment to rename the country is passed.<\/p>\n

    3. The Political Counter to \u201cINDIA\u201d Alliance<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Perhaps the most immediate trigger for the timing of the G20 rebranding was political.<\/p>\n

    In July 2023, 26 opposition parties formed a coalition called\u00a0\u201cINDIA\u201d (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance)<\/strong>\u00a0to challenge the BJP in the 2024 general elections. The acronym was deliberately chosen to counter the BJP\u2019s nationalist platform.<\/p>\n

    The Opposition\u2019s Charge:<\/strong>\u00a0The government\u2019s sudden push for \u201cBharat\u201d was a direct response to the formation of the INDIA alliance.<\/p>\n

    Rahul Gandhi stated in a video posted on social media: \u201cMaybe we irritated the government a little because we named our coalition INDIA and that got them all heated up. So now they\u2019ve decided to change the name of the country.\u201d<\/p>\n

    AAP leader Priyanka Kakkar echoed: \u201cThe reality is that PM Modi and the BJP are nervous about the INDIA alliance. After the third meeting of our alliance, hatred is being spread against the name \u2018INDIA.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

    \n

    GOVERNMENT\u2019S OFFICIAL DEFENSE<\/strong><\/p>\n

    BJP leaders have consistently refuted allegations that the \u201cBharat\u201d push is politically motivated.<\/p>\n

    External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cIndia is Bharat. It is there in the constitution. When you say Bharat, it evokes a sense, a meaning and a connotation.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cThis should have happened earlier. This gives great satisfaction to the mind. \u2018Bharat\u2019 is our introduction. We are proud of it. The President has given priority to \u2018Bharat\u2019. This is the biggest statement to come out of the colonial mindset.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami:<\/strong>\u00a0Hailed the turn to Bharat as \u201canother blow to the slavery mentality.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan:<\/strong>\u00a0Called it the biggest blow to the \u201ccolonial mindset.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The government\u2019s consistent position: The name \u201cIndia\u201d is a colonial relic imposed by the British, whereas \u201cBharat\u201d represents authentic Indian culture and heritage. Britain ruled India for about 200 years until independence in 1947, and the government has been keen to steer the country away from what it calls \u201cvestiges of British rule.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \n

    OPPOSITION\u2019S CRITICISM \u2013 THE COUNTER-ARGUMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Shashi Tharoor (Congress):<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cWhile there is no constitutional objection to calling India \u2018Bharat\u2019, which is one of the country\u2019s two official names, I hope the government will not be so foolish as to completely dispense with \u2018India\u2019, which has incalculable brand value built up over centuries.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Mamata Banerjee (TMC):<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cWe all say \u2018Bharat\u2019, what is new in this? But the name \u2018India\u2019 is known to the world\u2026 What happened suddenly that the government had to change the name of the country?\u201d<\/p>\n

    Rahul Gandhi (Congress):<\/strong>\u00a0Called the debate \u201cdistraction tactics\u201d and a sign of the BJP\u2019s \u201cfear\u201d ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.<\/p>\n

    Key Opposition Arguments:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    <\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Argument<\/th>\nDetails<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Political Motive<\/strong><\/td>\nThe timing confirms the move was triggered by the \u201cINDIA\u201d alliance formation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Brand Value<\/strong><\/td>\n\u201cIndia\u201d has centuries of global brand recognition; \u201cBharat\u201d lacks international cachet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Constitutional Respect<\/strong><\/td>\nArticle 1 already accommodates both names; no need for change<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Distraction Tactic<\/strong><\/td>\nThe government is diverting attention from real issues (unemployment, inflation)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Majoritarian Agenda<\/strong><\/td>\n\u201cBharat\u201d represents the Hindu majoritarian vision, excluding minority identities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

    CNN (September 2023):<\/strong>\u00a0Reported that the change \u201cfueled a political row and public debate over what the country should be called, its history and colonial legacy.\u201d The network noted that \u201cBritain ruled India for about 200 years until it gained independence in 1947, and Modi has been keen to position himself as a disrupter of India\u2019s colonial legacy.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The Express Tribune (Pakistan):<\/strong>\u00a0Quoted analysts who noted the \u201cclever coinage\u201d of the \u201cINDIA\u201d alliance to take on the BJP\u2019s nationalist platform, and speculated that the government\u2019s move was a direct counter.<\/p>\n

    Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI):<\/strong>\u00a0In an October 2023 issue brief, stated that the BJP\u2019s political adventure \u201chas spurred a fractious debate about whether the country is going to officially change its name.\u201d The brief noted that analysts worldwide are speculating on the possible rationale behind this semantics, calling it potentially the \u201cBJP\u2019s only card left for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections for majoritarian politics.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Observations on International Precedents:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Countries have changed their names before \u2013 Myanmar (formerly Burma) in 1989, Turkiye (formerly Turkey), Czechia (formerly Czech Republic), Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon). However, such changes typically require notification to the UN and acceptance by the international community.<\/p>\n

    \n

    SUPREME COURT POSITION<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Supreme Court has consistently refused to entertain petitions seeking a name change.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    <\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Year<\/th>\nOutcome<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    2015<\/strong><\/td>\nThe BJP-led Centre told the Supreme Court there was \u201cno change in circumstances since the Constituent Assembly debated the issue to warrant a review.\u201d The Court dismissed the plea.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2020<\/strong><\/td>\nChief Justice S.A. Bobde dismissed a PIL seeking a name change, stating: \u201cBharat and India are both names given in the Constitution. India is already called \u2018Bharat\u2019 in the Constitution.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    The Court has effectively held that no judicial intervention is required as the Constitution already accommodates both names.<\/p>\n

    \n

    WHAT WOULD A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT REQUIRE?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    If the government were to formally change the name from \u201cIndia\u201d to \u201cBharat\u201d in the English version of the Constitution, the following process would be required:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • \n

      Constitutional amendment under Article 368<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Ratification by at least half of the states<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Legal experts note that while possible, this would be a heavy lift politically and logistically.<\/p>\n

      \n

      THE \u201cBHARAT\u201d PUSH IN 2024 \u2013 BJP MANIFESTO<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The BJP\u2019s 2024 election manifesto prominently featured the word \u201cBharat\u201d throughout its English version. The foreign policy section was titled\u00a0\u201cBharat on the global stage.\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0One section was titled\u00a0\u201cModi ki Guarantee for Vishwa Bandhu Bharat\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 notably, not \u201cIndia.\u201d<\/p>\n

      Analysts noted that the manifesto\u2019s repeated use of \u201cBharat\u201d signaled the government\u2019s intent to continue and intensify the rebranding effort in a potential third term.<\/p>\n

      \n

      GROUND REALITY \u2013 WHERE DOES THE PUBLIC STAND?<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The Bharat vs India debate has revealed a deeply divided public opinion.<\/p>\n

      Arguments in Favor of \u201cBharat\u201d:<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      • \n

        Represents authentic Indian cultural identity<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Sheds colonial baggage<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Aligns with majority sentiment (Hindu population)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Supported by nationalist and Hindutva groups<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Arguments Against Exclusive \u201cBharat\u201d:<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        • \n

          \u201cIndia\u201d has global brand recognition and economic value<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          The Constitution already accommodates both names<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Minorities may feel alienated<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          The timing appears politically motivated<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          \n

          DATA TABLE: KEY TIMELINE OF THE BHARAT CONTROVERSY<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
          \n
          <\/div>\n
          <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
          Year<\/th>\nEvent<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
          1949<\/td>\nConstituent Assembly adopts \u201cIndia, that is Bharat\u201d in Article 1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          2004<\/td>\nUP Assembly (Mulayam Singh Yadav) passes resolution for \u201cBharat, that is India\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          2012<\/td>\nCongress MP Shantaram Naik moves bill in Rajya Sabha for name change<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          2015<\/td>\nSupreme Court dismisses PIL; Centre says no need for review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          2020<\/td>\nSupreme Court again dismisses name change plea<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          July 2023<\/td>\nOpposition forms \u201cINDIA\u201d alliance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          September 2023<\/td>\nG20 invites refer to \u201cPresident of Bharat\u201d; Modi sits behind \u201cBharat\u201d placard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          March 2025<\/td>\nRSS leader Hosabale intensifies \u201cdecolonisation\u201d campaign<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Feb-Mar 2025<\/td>\nSSUN launches signature campaign for constitutional amendment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
          \n

          CONCLUSION \u2013 BEYOND THE NAME, A DEEPER TRANSFORMATION<\/strong><\/p>\n

          The Bharat vs India controversy is not merely about semantics. It represents a fundamental struggle over India\u2019s identity \u2013 between a colonial past and a Hindu future, between global recognition and cultural authenticity, between pluralism and majoritarianism.<\/p>\n

          What the Government Achieved:<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          • \n

            Normalized \u201cBharat\u201d in official and diplomatic discourse<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Countered the opposition\u2019s \u201cINDIA\u201d branding<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Advanced the RSS\u2019s long-standing ideological agenda<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Energized the Hindu nationalist base ahead of elections<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            What Remains Unresolved:<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            • \n

              Whether a constitutional amendment will actually be pursued<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

            • \n

              Whether \u201cIndia\u201d \u2013 with its global brand value \u2013 will be completely phased out<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

            • \n

              How minorities and opposition states will respond to the cultural shift<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              As External Affairs Minister Jaishankar noted, \u201cWhen you say Bharat, it evokes a sense, a meaning and a connotation.\u201d But for millions of Indians \u2013 and for the world \u2013 \u201cIndia\u201d evokes something equally powerful.<\/p>\n

              The question is not whether the country will be renamed. The question is:\u00a0What does the nation lose \u2013 and who gains \u2013 when one name replaces another?<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n

              SUMMARY TABLE: BHARAT vs INDIA AT A GLANCE<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
              \n
              <\/div>\n
              <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
              Aspect<\/th>\n\u201cIndia\u201d<\/th>\n\u201cBharat\u201d<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
              Origin<\/strong><\/td>\nDerived from Sanskrit \u201cSindhu\u201d (Indus River); adapted by British<\/td>\nAncient Sanskrit term found in Puranas and Mahabharata<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Constitutional Status<\/strong><\/td>\nArticle 1: \u201cIndia, that is Bharat\u201d<\/td>\nArticle 1: \u201cIndia, that is Bharat\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Global Recognition<\/strong><\/td>\nIncurable brand value built over centuries<\/td>\nLimited international cachet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Political Association<\/strong><\/td>\nUsed by opposition \u201cINDIA\u201d alliance<\/td>\nFavored by BJP\/RSS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Cultural Connotation<\/strong><\/td>\nSecular, pluralistic, colonial-era<\/td>\nHindu, authentic, decolonized<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Legal Status<\/strong><\/td>\nNo change without constitutional amendment<\/td>\nRequires 2\/3 majority + state ratification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
              \n

              Continue Topic 2…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              Part 01 Proposal to remove \u201cIndia\u201d and use only \u201cBharat\u201d \u2013 What is the Hidden Saffron Agenda? In September 2023, a seemingly small change on a G20 dinner invitation sparked a national firestorm. The President of India was suddenly referred to as the \u201cPresident of Bharat.\u201d Within days, Prime Minister Modi sat behind a placard […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3863,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"googlesitekit_rrm_CAowk73GDA:productID":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[67,66],"tags":[816,812,827,824,811,814,823,818,353,822,813,817,829,825,820,828,819,815,821,826],"class_list":["post-3862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-social-issues","category-society-responsibility","tag-article-1-constitution","tag-bharat-controversy","tag-bharat-identity-politics","tag-bharat-rebranding-debate","tag-bharat-vs-india","tag-bjp-bharat-agenda","tag-constitutional-amendment-india-bharat","tag-g20-bharat-placard","tag-hindutva-politics","tag-india-alliance-bjp","tag-india-name-change-debate","tag-india-that-is-bharat","tag-indian-constitution-debate","tag-indian-politics-analysis","tag-narendra-modi-bharat","tag-opposition-vs-bjp","tag-president-of-bharat-controversy","tag-rss-bharat-campaign","tag-rss-decolonisation-agenda","tag-saffron-agenda"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3862"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3862\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3866,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3862\/revisions\/3866"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/untoldpages.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}